Powered by live market data

XRP Ledger Foundation Faces Huge Backlash Over Pity Bounty Payouts - U.Today

SECURITY

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available

The fix, version 3.4.1, went out weeks ago. Public binaries were released on September 25. The foundation says no XRP was created. It points out that XRP's supply was fixed at one hundred billion at launch and that all ledger data is public. About 99.986 billion XRP exist today, because transaction fees are destroyed. It also says triggering the bug required hundreds of intentionally constructed operations, so ordinary payments should never encounter it

Critics are not focused on the supply claim. They are angry about the payout. One person called the reward an absolute joke and warned that next time hackers will exploit first and ask for a bounty second. Another said the team deserves a bigger reward because the bug was catastrophic

A third said the foundation must pay bug finders well, or future hackers will consider the cheaper option instead. The sharpest comment said XRP is a scam if a decent bounty is not paid, and that the next flaw might not be disclosed responsibly

Normally, changes to the ledger go through an amendment process, in which validators vote over a period of weeks. This time the team skipped that step and shipped an emergency fix, the first time in over ten years

The foundation says a public fix would have shown attackers where the bug was, and AI makes finding it fast. It says the network, RippleX, core developers, and validators agreed on the plan together

Some users doubted the decentralization claims. One said a company they knew had trouble getting help to change a name within the ledger. Another asked why no safety stop exists if the supply goes above the cap. The foundation thanked Cayden Liao and Veria AI for reporting the bug responsibly. It also promised stronger testing and a larger bug bounty program. Whether this is enough to calm critics remains to be seen

Email